Skip navigation and go to the main content
Pillar 3
Charitable work
Reconnecting with roots through service learning. This is the pillar that slides into tokenism most easily, so every project goes through a fixed cycle — and we publish the outcome even when it is not flattering.
The cycle every project must pass
- Proposal — anyone can submit one: a member, a local partner, a summer camp participant.
- Field verification — a record of the real need, the beneficiaries, the risks and the local partner.
- Fundraising — a published target and the real figure as it stands.
- Delivery — photographs before, during and after, tied to a timeline.
- Handover with evidence — scanned receipts and the recipient’s confirmation.
- Follow-up after six to twelve months — against the outcome measures declared in the proposal.
The service learning camp
Young people from Czechia and local children eat, live and work on community projects together: repainting a village school, setting up a digital library, trading skills. At the end of the camp each participant delivers an individual project — submitted, marked, and given feedback.
Why the follow-up matters
Most charity work ends at the handover photograph. Six months later nobody asks whether anyone uses the digital library, or whether the repainted classroom is still being taught in.
Every project declares its own outcome measures in the proposal, and the follow-up measures exactly those. A project without its follow-up is publicly marked “awaiting follow-up” — we do not hide it.
Where the money goes
Every project has a public ledger — planned budget, money received, each item of spending — readable without logging in. Every payment carries a receipt. An internal or independent audit every year.
Lend a hand
Money is one way, not the only one. We need people to verify in the field, to translate, to run follow-ups, and specialists who can tell what is actually feasible.
Other programmes